Four right now: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, checked automatically every 48 hours, and all four come included in the free trial with nothing tacked on. Otterly.AI covers more out of the box, 7 engines total, but three of those (Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Mode) cost extra on top of its base plan. So it's less 4 vs 7 and more 4 included vs 4 included plus three paid add-ons.

That's really the core of the product, the Sprint ↔ Google loop. A citation gap gets flagged, turned into a sprint topic, and once the article ships, its GA4 and Search Console traffic gets joined back to it automatically, no manual tracking involved. Otterly gives you optimization briefs and content recommendations, which is genuinely useful, but it stops there; nothing in its published feature set carries a recommendation through to a shipped, measured article.

A daily automated process triangulates across three separate sources, Reddit OAuth, DataForSEO, and BrightData's LLM-answer scraping, then reranks the results with Jina before handing cited threads straight into a sprint. Otterly does mention Reddit as an example citation source on its marketing pages, but as of August 2026 there's no dedicated Reddit-tracking feature in its published docs.

Mainly dev-tool, API, and AI-agent companies, honestly. The docs/llms.txt audit, the early-access coding-agent benchmark, and the Reddit and developer-community citation tracking are all built around how developer audiences actually get cited by AI engines. That said, the core loop, a citation gap becoming a shipped article with its traffic measured automatically, isn't developer-specific; it works for any team publishing content to close a visibility gap.

Four published tiers: Lite at $29/mo (15 prompts, 4 engines), Standard at $189/mo (100 prompts, API/MCP access, Looker Studio connector), Premium at $489/mo (400 prompts, higher API/MCP caps), and Enterprise, which is custom-priced and includes SSO plus a dedicated success manager. Extra prompts and the extra engines (Claude, Gemini, AI Mode) cost more on top. Infrasity hasn't published what its paid tiers look like beyond the free trial.

Not as a company, no. Its security page traces its SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 mentions back to AWS, its hosting provider, not to Otterly.AI itself. Infrasity's footer displays an AICPA SOC compliance badge alongside a GDPR badge, but doesn't specify which SOC report type, so treat both companies as not having published a specific SOC 2 attestation of their own.

Yes, starting on its $189/mo Standard tier, with published caps (2,000 requests/mo on Standard, 5,000 on Premium). Infrasity lists 59 MCP tools, worth confirming what's actually live before you build around it.

Honestly, not published anywhere. Worth checking directly with the Infrasity team before assuming a migration or import path exists.